21st Jan 2012

S32 of the Civil Liability Act says there is no duty of care unless the defendant ought to have foreseen that a person of normal fortitude might in the circumstances suffer a recognised psychological/psychiatric injury. Circumstances include whether the harm was caused by sudden shock; the plaintiff witnessed the injury/death at the scene; pre-existing relationship between plaintiff and defendant. There is no duty of care if you were not at the scene unless you were a close member of family of the victim, such as a spouse, parent, child etc.

This publication is not legal advice. It is intended as a source of information only. No reader should act on any matter without first obtaining professional advice.

Comments are closed.

What matters must a Court take into account in determining whether a defendant owed a duty of care to a plaintiff to avoid causing him or her to suffer mental harm of nervous shock? - AM Legal Compensation Lawyers                                

Contact us

We're not around right now. But you can send us an email and we'll get back to you, asap.

Questions, issues or concerns? I'd love to help you!

Click ENTER to chat